Daily Justice

Abuja, 24 April 2025 – A significant political shift is underway in Nigeria as a growing number of prominent politicians from the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) defect to the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC). This wave of defections has sparked intense debate, with allegations that some politicians are seeking to evade ongoing investigations by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) for alleged corrupt enrichment.

Recent posts on X have highlighted high-profile defections, including former Delta State Governor and PDP vice-presidential candidate Ifeanyi Okowa, alongside his political ally, the current Delta State Governor, reportedly joining the APC amid EFCC probes. Similarly, former Akwa Ibom State Governor Udom Emmanuel is said to be considering a move to the APC while facing corruption allegations. These claims, though unverified, reflect a broader sentiment that defections may be motivated by a desire to escape legal scrutiny.

The EFCC has been investigating numerous politicians for financial misconduct, with cases involving billions of naira in alleged fraud. For instance, former Akwa Ibom Governor Godswill Akpabio, who defected to the APC in 2018, was under investigation for diverting over ₦100 billion during his tenure. Despite these allegations, his case stalled after joining the APC, fuelling speculation that alignment with the ruling party offers a shield from prosecution.

A controversial statement by Adams Oshiomhole, former APC National Chairman, has further intensified these suspicions. In 2019, Oshiomhole declared that politicians who joined the APC would have their “sins forgiven,” a remark widely interpreted as an assurance that defectors could escape EFCC scrutiny. Although Oshiomhole later faced his own EFCC investigation for alleged corruption during his time as Edo State Governor, his comments continue to resonate as defections persist.

Analysts suggest that the promise of protection under President Bola Tinubu’s administration is a key driver. “There’s a perception that Tinubu, as APC leader, could influence the EFCC to halt investigations against loyalists,” said a political analyst in Lagos. “This creates an incentive for politicians facing legal battles to switch sides.” However, no concrete evidence confirms that Tinubu has directly ordered the EFCC to drop cases, and the Presidency has not commented on these allegations.

Beyond EFCC investigations, other factors contribute to the defections. The APC’s dominance at the federal level offers access to patronage networks, political appointments, and electoral advantages. For instance, Zamfara State Governor Bello Matawalle’s 2021 defection to the APC was seen as a strategic move to align with the ruling party ahead of the 2023 elections. Similarly, internal PDP conflicts, such as leadership disputes and lack of party cohesion, have pushed some politicians to seek greener pastures in the APC.

Critics argue that these defections undermine Nigeria’s democracy. “Politicians are jumping ship for personal gain, not ideology,” said Aisha Yusuf, a civil society activist. “This erodes public trust and weakens opposition, risking a one-party state.” Oshiomhole himself warned in 2018 that the PDP’s dominance had nearly turned Nigeria into a one-party state, a concern now echoed about the APC’s growing influence.

The APC has downplayed the controversy, with party spokesperson Felix Morka stating, “Our doors are open to those who share our vision for Nigeria’s progress. Defections are a normal part of democratic politics.” Meanwhile, the PDP has accused the APC of harbouring corrupt politicians, with PDP Publicity Secretary Debo Ologunagba calling for the EFCC to remain independent and pursue all cases impartially.

As Nigeria approaches future elections, the wave of defections shows no signs of abating. Whether driven by a desire to evade EFCC investigations, secure political relevance, or both, these moves highlight the complex interplay of power, patronage, and accountability in Nigerian politics. For now, the public watches closely, questioning whether justice will prevail or if political loyalty will continue to trump legal accountability.